Ramavath Gopi Krishna, Nalgonda Dist. And 3 Others v. M.P.D.O. Nalgonda Dist. And 2 Others
[ 3304 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO:16727 OF 2010 Between:
1. Ramavath Gopi Krishna, S/o.Gopal Sln.Sf-,, Aged -about 29 years, Occ: Technical Assistant Chandempet Mandal, Nalgonda District.
2. Paoilla Narsimha. S/o.Bakkaiah, aqed about 36 years, Occ: Tractor Owner Fl/ol. Polepally Village, Chandempet-Mandal, Nalgonda District.
3. Pandiri Venkat Reddy, S/o.Narayana Reddy, aged 'about .38 .years, Occ: Tractor Owner Rl/-o. Polepally -Village, Chandempet Mandal, Nalgonda District.
4. Gundala Venkataiah, Sio.Nadipi Kashaiah, aged about 39 years, Occ: Tractor Owner R/o. Polepally Village, Chandempet Mandal, Nalgonda District' ...PETITIONERS AND '1 . The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Chandampet Mandal, Nalgonda District.
2. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, Nalgonda.
3. The Station House Officer, Chandampet P.S., Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned Memo No.E1113441HN2O10 d1.11.6.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent herein requesting the 1st respondent to recover the amount from the petitioners and book criminal cases against the petitioners herein as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently set aside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010 (WPMP. NO: 2'1077 0F 20101 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned Memo No.E111 344/HR/2010 dt 11.6.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent herein including booking of criminal cases against the petitioners herein, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SAI GOPI REPRESENTING FOR SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 and 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.16727 0F 20lo - ORDER:
Sri Sai Gopi, learned counsel representing Sri Nageswar Rao Palle, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2.' In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending," shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
ASSI sdl-L.
STANT LAKSHMI GI BABU \ IIRUE COPYII SE OFFICER High Court for the f Telangana' at To, 1.
L.
3.
TJ MP (P
HIGH COURT DATED:1411112024 1HI .07 IAN 2W
ORDER
, WP.No.16727 ot 2010 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
I ( * I lh l> 1l gCo|;j-),