← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/4284/2016disposed of no costs

M/S. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, v. M/S. Costal Projects Ltd.,

2016-09-06C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy,T. Rajani3 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD Date:06.9.2016 CRP.No.4283 of 2016 Between:

M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Bangalore and another.

..... Petitioner And:

M/s Costal Projects Limited, Hyderabad, reptd by its Authorized Signatory-G.Hari Hara Rao and two others.

....Respondents AND CRP.No.4284 of 2016 Between:

M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Bangalore and another.

..... Petitioner And:

M/s Costal Projects Limited, Hyderabad, reptd by its Authorized Signatory-G.Hari Hara Rao and another.

....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. P.Rajasekhar Counsel for the respondents: None appeared The Court made the following:

CVNR, J & GSP, J Dt:06.9.2016 COMMON ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) Feeling aggrieved by non-disposal of Arbitration O.P.Nos.159 and 265 of 2015 by the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the said O.Ps have filed these Civil Revision Petitions under Article-227 of the Constitution of India.

A perusal of the record shows that respondent No.1 has filed the afore-mentioned O.Ps under Section-9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for injunction restraining the petitioners herein from invoking or encashing the bank guarantees furnished by respondent No.1 unless and until the disputes are settled between the parties through arbitration. By order, dated 06.02.2015, the lower Court has granted injunction order till disposal of the said O.Ps. The petitioners averred that the lower Court is not disposing of the afore-mentioned O.Ps and it has even dismissed the petitions filed for advancement of the said cases. In our opinion, when the lower Court has stayed the encashment of the bank guarantees, it is obligatory on its part to dispose of the afore-mentioned O.Ps as expeditiously as possible. As the lower Court has failed to do so, it is directed to dispose of Arbitration O.P.Nos.159 and 265 of 2015 as early as possible,

CVNR, J & GSP, J Dt:06.9.2016 and, not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

The Civil Revision Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of As a sequel to disposal of the Civil Revision Petitions, CRPMP.No.5583 and 5584 of 2016 filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY ______________________ JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD 06th September 2016 DR