Lokere Kantha Bai And 3 Others v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEI\,IBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4085 OF 2020 Between:

'1 . Lokere Kantha Bai, Wo. late P Ramesh Chander, aged 62 years, Retired Government Servant, R/o. H. No. 3-3-1 1 0/RSYR/102. Hyderluda. Attapur, Hyderabad

2. Sushma S. D., Wo. late Deepak Kumar, aged 42 years, R/o. H. No. 3-3-1 1O/RSYR/102, Hyderguda, Attapur, Hyderabad

3. Shreya S.D, D/o, late Deepak Kumar, aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o. H. No. 3-3-1'1O/RSYR/102, Hyderguda, Attapur, Hyderabad

4. Prashanth Pathangay, S/o. late Ramesh Chander, aged 36 years, Occ. Private Service, R/o. Flat No. 305, Vaishnavi source Apartments Krishna Nagar Hasmathpet, Secunderabad 500 009

...Petitioners/A1 to A4

AND The state of Telangana, represented by Station House Officer Rajendranagar Police Station through Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad ... Respondents/Com Plaina nt Petition under section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Police to enlarge the petltioners on bail in the vent of their arrest by granting Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners in crime No.1338 of 2o2o pending on the file of the SHO Rajendranagar Police station Hyderabad in the interest of the justice This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSriCH.Srinivas, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent' The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K' LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No.4o85 oF 2020 ORDER:

This application is filed under Section 438 Cr'P'C' seeking to enlarge the petitioners herein on anticipatory bail in Cr.No.133B of 2O2O pending on the file of Rajenderanagar Police Station.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the above said FIR was registered under Section 1.74 of Cr.P.C. The l"t petitioner is the mother, the 2nd petitioner is the wife, the 3'd petitioner is the daughter and the 4th petitioner is the brother-in-law of the deceased. There is no allegation against the petitioners herein. 3.

Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the police have recorded the statements of five u'itnesses, including the statements of father and sister of the deceased. There is nothing alleged against the petitioners herein. So far, the police have not shown the petitioners herein as accused in the FIR. Even then, the petitioners filed the present application with an apprehension. 4 .

Recording the said submission of the learned Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Petition is closed. The petitioners are at liberty to move appropriate application in

) the event of Police shor.r.ing them as accused in Cr.No. 133g of 2020.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if an1,, shall stand disposed of.

Sd/. N. CHANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGIS R TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To

1. The ll Executive Magistrate cum Thasildar, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District

2. The Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri CH. Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies PNO \ V

( HIGH COURT KLJ DATED:2910912020 tr)d 16:

r t l{ (i q )oo 12 0$2m a r\ .a cO c * t) T

ORDER

CRLP.No'4085 of 2020 CLOSING THE CRIMINAL PETTTION 0 x,{,'