Koya Nagamani v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2758 of 2016 01.02.2016 Between:
Koya Nagamani .. Petitioner and The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Rama Sharana Sharma Counsel for respondent No.1: Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development (TS) Counsel for respondent No.3: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (TS) Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 4: - The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in making the delimitation of the Wards against the Rules prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.570, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, dated 06.11.1996, as well as preparing the voters list including the dead persons and also their inaction in responding to the several representations of many local residents including the petitioner herein, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to the respondents to conduct fresh delimitation of all the Wards, by following the aforementioned G.O., and to prepare the voters list afresh, after deleting the dead persons.
At the hearing, Mr.G.Vidya Sagar, learned senior counsel appearing for the State Election Commission - respondent No.4, has submitted that the petitioner has not questioned the subsequent G.O.Ms.No.78, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (C1) Department, dated 16.06.2015. Mr.P.Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon
realizing the above mistake, requested for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to his client to file a fresh writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the prayer made.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.3452 of 2016 filed by the petitioner for interim relief shall stand dismissed as infructuous. ______________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 01st February, 2016 GHN