M. Srinivasulu Reddy, (A-3), v. Thati Sulochanamma,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1112 OF 2007 ORDER:

1. This revision case is filed by the petitioners-accused challenging the order dated 7.5.2007 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6 of 2007 in S.C.No.355 of 2006 by the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge (FTC) Nellore.

2. The petitioners are alleged to have committed the offence punishable under Sections 365, 385, 341, 464, 109, 192, 324, 188, 353, 354 r/w 34 IPC and Section 44 of the A.P. District Police Act, 1859. It is alleged that at the instance of A1, A3 to A5 with the assistance of A2 kidnapped the complainant and her son to the police club and kept them in wrongful confinement for two days and beat them indiscriminately and forced the complainant and her son to execute six promissory notes each for Rs.1,00,000/-, and they also obtained the signature of the complainant on blank stamped paper and blank cheques. On 8.12.2001, A2, A6 and A8 forcibly took the complainant, her husband and her son and wrongfully confined them in the police club for one week and demanded them to execute registered sale deeds in respect of their house property.

3. The petitioners herein filed the impugned Crl.M.P. before the learned II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge (FTC), Nellore seeking to discharge them from the above Sessions Case. The learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed this revision.

4. When this matter has been taken up, the complainant filed an affidavit before this Court stating that the matter was settled out of Court and therefore, she is not inclined to prosecute the matter against the petitioners. One of the aggrieved persons in the instant case i.e.,

Vasantha Kumar Reddy, who is the son of the complainant, appeared before this Court and submitted that he has no interest to prosecute the matter further.

5. Considering the affidavit of the complainant and also the oral statement made by one of the aggrieved persons, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be discharged.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed setting aside the order under revision and discharging the petitioners-accused from the Sessions Case No.355 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge (FTC), Nellore.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Date : 12.08.2016 Nn

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1112 OF 2007 Dated 12th August, 2016.

Nn