← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/4332/2010dismissed no costs

Basavani Bhogeswara Rao v. The Tahsildar

2015-03-17P Naveen Rao4 pages

Date: 17.03.2015 Between:

Basavani Bhogeswara Rao, s/o.Suryanarayana, Aged about 57 years, Residing at Mallampudi Village, Hamlet of Chorampudi, Bantumilli Mandal, Krishna District.

.. Petitioner AND The Tahsildar, Bantumilli Village, Bantumilli Mandal, Krishna District.

.. Respondent The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This writ petition is instituted alleging that the respondent authorities are interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac.1.72 cents in R.S.No.429 of Chorampudi Revenue Village in spite of orders issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.441 Revenue (ASSN.II) Department, dated 23.07.2002 and it is subject matter of Writ Petition No.20818 of 2002.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that under the guise of order of status quo granted, respondent authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the above extent of land, causing irreparable hardship and suffering and when the issue is pending consideration of this Court, respondent authorities ought not to have interfered with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.

3. Counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondent. The specific allegations of the petitioner are denied. It is contended that taking advantage of the political influence enjoyed by the petitioner, he tried to dig fish tank in R.S.Nos.1102/1, 2 and 1095 of Chorampudi Village without having any right or title over the land and without obtaining appropriate permissions and, therefore, he was prevented from doing his illegal digging of fish tank. It is contended that the irrigation bodhi is running through the above lands which supplies water to the neighbouring ryots for irrigating their lands and if the petitioner is allowed to dig fish tank, water course will be disturbed and the neighbouring ryots will sustain heavy loss. It is further contended

that petitioner's wife owns land in Munipeda village of Kruthivennu Mandal and fish tank is being dug in an extent of Ac.4.94 cents. This Munipeda village is adjacent to Mallapudi village, hamlet of Chorampudi Village. Petitioner is trying to extend his fish tank from Munipeda village to the adjacent lands in Chorampudi village.

4. No other material is brought on record to show that the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the land in R.S.No.429 of Chorampudi village and that the respondent authorities are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the land. On the contrary, according to the assertion of the respondent, the adjacent land of the family members of the petitioner in Munipeda village is land in R.S.Nos.1102/1, 2 and 1095, which are Government lands and not land in R.S.No.429. The said assertion is not denied. Petitioner has not shown any material in support of his contentions. I, therefore, see no merit in the contention urged by the petitioner.

5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date : 17.03.2015 kkm

Date: 17.03.2015 kkm