Kancharakuntla Padma v. Kancharkuntla Venkat Reddy

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGA,NA

ATHYDERABAD "

THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AI.ID THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 265 OF 2005 Appeal Under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act against the JudgmenUDecree in HII/OP No. 114 o't 2022, dated '18.02.2005 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Khammam.

Between:

Kancharakuntld Padma, Wo.Kancharkuntla Venkat Reddy R/o.Yeluvarigudem Village, Tirumalayapalem l\ilandal, Khammam District. ...APPELLANT AND Kancharkuntla Venkat Reddy, S/o.Venkatram Reddy Fl/o.Yeluvarigudem Village, Tirumalayapalem Mandal, Khammam District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant : Sri M. RAJAMALLA REDDY (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent : Sri P. VEERA REDDY The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON.BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CTVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.265 OF 2OO5 JUDGMENT: (l'er Hon'ble Dr.SA,J) No representation for the appellant.

2.

The appeal is of the year 2005. It appears that the appellant has no interest to pursue the appeal. 3.

Under these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for d efa u lt.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. -sal lii' mINfiLA DEPUJXSEGISTRAR //rRUE coPY// secH8lr .FFI.ER \ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, at Khammam'

2. One CC to Sri M. RAJAMALLA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri P. VEERA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD CoPies Njb €Dt

HIGH COURT DATED:1 311012022 I )

JUDGMENT

? I Frt lt?X CMA.No.265 of 2005 II .)/.

-.rf APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT <t