A. Jyothi v. Union Of India And Another
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
I I l [ 3301 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No: 18786 0F 2022 Between:
A. Jvothi, W/o: Late S.V. Subba Rao. D/o Late A'S. Ranganayakulu, Aged ;b.,ii;;'r;;;;, oi.. nort" *ife. Rvo H No l-e-202l26 Hanuman colonv' Kushaiguda, HYDERABAD - 500062 ,,.PETITIONER AND Union of lndia, rep. by General l\,4anager South Central Railway Sanchalan Bhavan SECUNDERABAD \
2. Senior Divisional Commissioner / RPF, South Cen.tral Railway, Security - eiinlf,, Hvaerabad Division / SC SECUNDERABAD ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtoissueorderororders,writorwrits,moreparticularlyinthenatureofwrit of mandamus and quash and set aside the 2"d respondent order No. No. Y/_xP.l626t Pension l HYBI 2021 Dated 08.02.2022 being illegal, arbitrary, andcontrary to the rules and consequently direct the respondents to grant and release theSecondaryfam|lypensiontothePetitionerConsideringtheincomecertificate and etc without insisting for No objection certificate from her biological brothers in the i IANO:1 OF 2022 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pieased to direct
the respondents to pay the provisional family Pension to the petitioner pending writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MS' SHAMAITHA, REPRESENTING FOR SRI M. VENKANNA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUW SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI NARAPARAJU AVANEESH t t i i The Court made the following: ORDER i
l l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK .lli WRIT PETITION No.18786 OF 2022 ORDER:
)t|'
.i ir Ms.Shamaitha, learned counsel representing i::
li Sri M.Venkanna, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks I.i i:
permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2.
Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
3.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as ].
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs, t'i Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this writ petition sha1l stand closed AssrsrAi?r#'S'SmH //TRUE COPYI/ ECTION OFFICER Generar or rndia To, 1 3ffi 3313 3,,J*.Y"il:i::i''{*Yiil:J?'!"?l''''"' i 8IJ3J; sri Naraparaiu Avaneesh' sctoPuocl i. r*o CD coPtes TJ GJP (+
HIGH COUR DATED:31 11212024 \-\6- srArt'
) ti ( ;
ORDER
0 5 uA'll,2[25 WP.No.18786 of 2022 I DEsPATo a \'J \ ','
\' :'
)r DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ?P t3 I'