Kanmal Aja Kumar R/O Dhankuti, Kanpur, Utterpradesh State v. M. Venkateswarlu R/O Vikarabad, R.R.District

[ 3208 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD SATURDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA FIRST APPEAL NO: 445 OF 2008 Appeal Under Section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 05-09-2002 made in O.S. No. 49 of 1994 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District.

Between:

Kanmal Aja Kumar, Kirana Grain, Oil Seed Merchant and Commission Agents, Rep. by its Proprietor, Teekamchand Shefty, S/o. Kanmal Shetty,aged about 55 years, R/o. Dhankuti, Kanpur, State of Uttar Pradesh ...APPELLANT/DEFENDANT AND M. VENKATESWARLU and Brother, rep. by its Proprietor M. Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Pandurangam, R/o Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF ASMP. NO: 974 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of execution of the decree in O.S.No. 49 of 1994 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, R.R.District.

Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. V. VENKATARAMANA (Not Present) , Counsel for the Respondent : SRI PALLA DAMODAR REDDY The Court made the following:

i

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUITNO. zl45 OF 2008 JUDG MENT:

Plaintiff filed O.S.No.49 of 1994 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, R.R.District for recovery of money and the same was decreed, against which defendant therein preferred the present Appeal Suit before this Court.

2.

A perusal of the docket proceedings shows that the learned counsel for the appellant did not evince any interest to pursue the present appeal proceedings. On 02.08.2023 there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel fot' the appellant and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation for the appellant. No purpose would be served in continuing the Appeal Suit.

3.

Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR !

t SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge' Vikarabad, R R District' 2, One CC to SRl. V. VENKATARAMANA' Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. PALLA DAMODAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies HA/DL\U

HIGH COURT DATED:2310912O23 t

JUDGMENT

AS.No.445 of 2008 2 I ttB 2i2l J * ;,.

t) /\T DISMISSED ,)p