M/S. Vijeta Khadi Gramodyog Sangha v. M/S S.E. Graphites Pvt. Ltd
[ 321s I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.R.ADHA RANI C.C.C.A. NO: 260 OF 2019 Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 0110312019 made in OS No.118 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Cou(, Secunderabad.
Between:
M/s. Vijeta Khadi Gramodyog Sangha, Rep. by its Secretary H.Shivraj, S/o.Basavannappa Halshetty, aged 62 years, Occ- Business, Having its office at H.No. 30, Banker Colony, Shivajinagar (South), Bidar-585401 , Karnataka AND ...APPELLANT/ DEFENDANT M/s S.E. Graphites Pvt. Ltd, (A company registered underthe Companies Act) Rep. by its Executive Director and authorized person, Yogesh Shah, S/o Shantilal Shah, A,/a 54 yrs, Occ. Business, having its office at Flat No. 33, Madhukunj Apartments, S.P Road, Secunderabad ..RESPONDENT/ PLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to judgment and decree 01-03-2019 in O.S No.
118 of 2O12 on the file of I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, pending disposal of CCCA No.260 of 2019, on the file of the High Court.
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI I C.C.C.A. No.260 of 2019 JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 01-03-2019 passed in O.S. No.1 18 of 2012 by the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation by the learned counsel for the appellant.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that on 24.09.2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 this Court granted stay in favour of the appellant on condition ofdepositing 50% ofthe decretal amount, but the appellant had not complied with the said order till date.
4. [n view of the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, it is considered fit to dismiss the appeal as the appellant had not complied with the order dated 24-09-2021 passed in I.A.No,1 of 2019.
5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs" Miscellaneous Applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To The I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad One CC to Sri Sudhakar Rlo Kulkarni, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Thomas George, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies \\ _r.-\z_ Kj
HIGH COURT DATED:0810212023 1 HE ST4 14:
q T.:
)3 zs lrRR
JUDGMENT
I \'*'+\t oo^^.- \\\''
r".'., -S.=-:::
CCCA.No.260 of 2019 DISMISSING CCCA WITHOUT COSTS.
\l>1