Ms. Silpa Nannapaneni, v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.11497 of 2018 O R D E R:

Heard counsel for petitioner and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3.

2.

It is stated by counsel on both sides that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered by order dt.29.08.2016 in W.P.No.28525 of 2016.

3.

Therefore, for reasons alike, this is Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner satisfying requirement of Section 428 of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and also subject to the petitioner giving an undertaking that the petitioner would not claim equities or costs of the building construction, in the event LGC been decided against the petitioner, without reference to the letter dt.31-10-2013 of the Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to costs.

4.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 11th April, 2018.

gra