Mettu Bal Redd, v. Sri Karmanghat Hanuman Devasthanam,

[3302 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 8125 OF 2008 Between:

'1. Mettu Bal Redd, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 54 years.

2. Mettu Yadi Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 51 years.

3. Mettu Chandra Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 48 years.

4. M.Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Butchi Reddy, aged about 52 years.

5. Ivl.Krishna Reddy, S/o. Butchi Reddy, aged about 50 years.

6. M.Sanjeeva Reddy, S/o. Butchi Reddy, aged about 48 years.

7. Peddi Muralidhar, S/o. Srihari, aged about 50 years. (All are agriculturists and resident of Champapeta Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District) ...PETITIONERS AND

1. Sri Karmanghat Hanuman Devasthanam, Saroornagar, Rep by its Executive Officer, R.R.Dist.,

2. Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad.

3. The Joint Collector-ll, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy East Division, Gosha Mahal, Hyderabad.

,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the 3rd respondent vide Case No. F119053/2003, dated 28.04.2006, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and facts of the case and consequently confirm the order of the 4th respondent vide Lr.No.Jl1854l2001 dated Nil-10-2003 granting Occupancy Rights Certificates in favour of the petitioners in respect of the lands in Sy.No.1 55,1 60, 161 ,162 and 1 80 situated at Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under their occupation.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 1 0710 0F 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the 1st respondent herein not to interfere with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment over the lands under their occupation in Sy.No.155, '160, 161,162 and 180 situated at Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2008(WPMP. NO:'10711 OF 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order of the 3rd respondent vide Case No.F119053/2003, dated 28.04.2006, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 33190 0F 2008) Between:

1 . Chall Linga Reddy, S/o. Late. Sri. C.Papa Reddy, aged 62 years, Occ: Agricultural, Rl/o. H.No. 1-128, Jilleguda Village, Saroornagar Mandal R.R. District

2. Chall Jayasimha Reddy, S/o. Chall Linga Reddy, Aged 41 years, Occ: Agricultural, Rl/o. H.No. 1-128, Jilleguda Village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R District.

3. Challa Jayachander Reddy, S/o. Sri. Challa Linga Reddy, Aged 38 years, Occ: Agricultural, Rl/o. H.No.1-128, Jilleguda Village, Saroomagar Mandal, R.R. District

4. Smt. Challa Pushpavathi, Wio. Sri. Challa Linga Reddy, Aged 58 Years, Occ: House hold, Rl/o. H.No.1-128, Jilleguda Village, Saroorganar Mandal, R.R District.

...PETITIONERS/PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.5 TO 8 AND '1 . Mettu Bal Redd, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 54 years.

2. Mettu Yadi Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 51 years.

3. Mettu Chandra Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 48 years.

4. M.Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Butchi Reddy, aged about 52 years.

5. M.Krishna Reddy, S/o. Butchi Reddy, aged about 50 years.

6. M.Sanjeeva Reddy, S/o. Butchi Reddy, aged about 48 years.

7. Peddi Muralidhar, S/o. Srihari, aged about 50 years. (All are agriculturists and resident of Champapeta Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District)

8. Sri Karmanghat Hanuman Devasthanam, Saroornagar, Rep by its Executive Officer, R.R.Dist.,

9. Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad. '10.The Joint Collector-ll, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. '1 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy East Division, Gosha Mahal, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to get implead in WPMP No. / 2008 in WP No. 812512008 as party Respondent No. 5 to B in the interest of justice of or else the Petitioners herein will be put to great hardship and suffer irreparable loss.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. J KANAKAIAH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: NONE APPEARD Counsel for the Respondent 2 and 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTTCE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.8125 of 2OO8 ORDER:- Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not survive and thereby the Writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As sequel to it, Misceilaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

\ //rRU E "o r;:' "'

-i6 s'tliH i'w* '"i?w:EEi"ls':"if:ffiiH#[tlff"i"i;rrumr:?i+1r3"'"'] touTl +. Two CD CoPies TJ - GJPrU---

HIGH COURT DATED:2811212022 -'; ST4rs ( 3 1 ll}i ?0?3 o (

ORDER

t)l i\ '7 \ WP.No.8125 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS oo @ o4*'

frl\k-- )D \