Sri Rama Raju Theatre v. The State Of A.P.

[25sstr (st-tow cAr.JSE NoTrcE tsEFoRE ADMtSStON) I.IIGI-I COURT OF JUDICATI..'RE AT O-iYDERABAD FOR Th{E STATE OF TEI-ANGANA ANO THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADEShI MONDAY, TI-iE'TWEhITY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11389 OF 2018 Between:

'1. Uday Kumar Mekala, S/o.Satyam, Aged about 32 years, Occ: Government Employee, R/o. H.No. 12-131,Santosh nagar, Nakerakal(V&M), Nalgonda District

2. Sathyam Mekala, S/o. Lakshmaiah, Aged about 55 years, R/o. H.No. 12131,Santosh Nagar,Nakerakal(V&M), Nalgonda District

3. Chandrakala Mekala, Wo. Satyam, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H No. 12-13'l ,Santosh Nagar, Nakerakal(V&M), Nalgonda District

4. Kiran Kumar Mekala, Sio.Satyam, Aged about 25 years, R/o. H.No. 12- '13l,Santosh Nagar, Nakerakal(V&M), Nalgonda District.

5. Sai Kumar Mekala, S/o. Satyam, Aged about 24 years, R/o. H.No. 12-131, Santhosh Nagar, Nakrekal(V&M), Nalgonda District. AND

...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5

1. State of Telangana through SHO, Police Station Suryapet, Suryapet District, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

2. Anitha Mekala, Wo. Uday Kumar, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. 11 -7-3ll,Thallagadda Village,Suryapeta Mandal, Suryapet District. ...RespondenUdefacto Complainant WHEREAS the Petitioners/Accused above named through their Advocate Smt T Rajyalaxmi, presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No. 140/2018 on the file of the P.S Suryapeta Town for the offence under section 498-4 IPC and Section 3 and 4 DP Act against the Petitioner.

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Smt T Rajyalaxmi, Advocate for the Petitioners, and the Public Prosecutor (TG) for thq Respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to Respondent Nb.2 herein to show cause as to why this Criminal Petition should not be admitted. You viz:

Anitha Mekala, Wo. Uday Kumar, R/o. 1-1-7-3ll,Thallagadda Village,Suryapeta Mandal, Suryapet District.

are directed to show cause on or before 13.11.2018 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this Criminal Petition should not be admitted. The Court made the followinq QR ER:

Notice before admission.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to respondent No.2 by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service.

Post on 13.11.2018 in the motion list.

Sd/-K.Jagan Mohan ASSISTANT REGISTRAR FoT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//

:

,o,

1. Anitha Mekala, Wo. Uday Kumar, R/o. 1-1-7-311 ,Thallagadda Village,Suryapeta Mandal, Suryapet District.

(by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)

2. One CC to Sri. T Rajyalaxmi, Advocate IOPUC]

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor (TG) High Court at Hyderabad[OUT].

4. One spare copy.

bsg

HIGH COURT DT.SSRB,J DATED: 2911012018 POST ON 13.11.2018 IN THE MOTION LIST.

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION a / CRLP.No.11389 ot 2018