Vadithe Kuppa Naik v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11495 OF 2018 O R D E R :

This writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings No.3804/Vig.A/V2/GHMC/2017, dated 04.10.2017 wherein and whereby, the petitioner was suspended from service on the ground that he was arrested in a criminal case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner by relying on the Judgment of Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhary v. Union of India (2015 (7) SCC 291) submits that since charge sheet is not filed within three months from the date of suspension, the order of suspension has to be quashed.

On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for Services submits that the Division Bench of this Court considered the aforesaid Judgment along with other Supreme Court Judgments in WP.No.7618 of 2015 dated 01.06.2015, wherein it is held that revocation of suspension after completion of three months is not automatic. Further the Government also issued G.O.Ms.No.86, dated 08.03.1994 providing for review of suspension orders after completion of six months from the date of suspension. In this case it is to be seen that the Division Bench of this Court in WP.No.7618/2018 considered the Judgment of Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar choudhary's case and held that merely

because charge sheet is not filed within three months from the date of suspension order, revocation of suspension is not automatic. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to review the order of suspension of petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.86, Gen.Admn.(Ser.C) Dept. dated 08.03.1994, and pass orders.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.

_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 16.04.2014 t k.