B. Maharushi v. The Director
[ 3301 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 14078 OF 2023 Between:
B. [Vlaharushi, S/o. Late B. Laxminarayana, Age. Oio. Director, Telangana Govt. Text Bo;k Khirathabad, Hyderabad. Telangana State.
56 years, Occ. Senior Asst, Press, [Vlint Compound, ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Director, Telangana Govt. Text Book press, Mint Compound, Khirathabad, Hyderabad. Telangana State.
2. Jhe State of Telangana, Eep., by its principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS.- a) by declaring the entire action of the respondents particularly the entire action of the 1st respondent in issuing the present impugned Proc. Rc. No. 5461ET712013 dated. '1 7-8-202 1 inctuding consequential appeal rejection orders in memo Rc. No. 1081/ell2022 dated.
S-7 -2022, wherein imposing a punishment of stoppage of one periodical increment with cumulate effect, even though petitioner is nothing to do with the alleged charge and imposing such penalty after lapse of more than 5 years from the alleged charge memo for the issue 2010 is as highly illegal, arbitrary , unjust , total non application of mind, shockingly disproportionate than the alleged charge and set aside the same. b) and consequently to direct the respondents, reconsider and review the above impugned orders of punishment dated. 17-08-2021 as the alleged charge leveled against the petitioner is very minor in nature and not related to any misappropriation or misuse of funds.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent without reference to the present impugned proceedings issued in Rc. No. 546lET7l2O13 dated.l t -8-2021 of the 1 st respondent including consequential appeal rejection orders in memo RC. No. 1og1le1l2o22 dated. g-72022, o'f the 1st respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt SANTHAPUR SAWANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES lV The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.l4O7 E OF 2023 ORDER:
I i Sri S. Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has addressed a letter, d,ated O7.12.2023, Lo the Registrar (Judicial), wherein he has submitted that the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the petition. Hence, learned counsel sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2.
Permission is accorded.
3.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs SD/.N. SRTHARI //TRUE COPYtt ASSISTANT REGIST R SECTION OFFICER To One CC to SRt SANTHApT iy,"[?i1""?S#SeHV,EE3:iJl,ll0,Tfl f]il,ff 3bflt"&,i?L??y""j,, Two CD Copies PSK.
GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:1211212023
ORDER
1r{E strat5.
WP.No.14078 of 2023 q Jo 1 I JAN 202[ v () r.-') P2. fcl\ DEti t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
t Ld)\