Pallerlamudi Venkata Rajendra Prasad, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26823 OF 2016 ORDER:

The case of the petitioner is that he submitted applications dated 05.04.2016 and 21.01.2016 for correction of the surname of his father as 'Pallerlamudi' in the place of 'Kadiyala' and for issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds in favour of the petitioner in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.1.26 cents in R.S.No.2/2B of Kondamarajupalem Village, Tulluru Mandal of Guntur District. It is also stated that on application of the petitioner the Tahasildar, G.Konduru mandal after conducting enquiry through Mandal Revenue Inspector, has given a certificate through proceedings in Rc.A/1567/2015, dated 28.08.2015 certifying that Pallerlamudi Srinivasa Rao and Kadiyala Srinivasa Rao of Kuntamukkala Village are one and the same. Having obtained the said certificate from the Tahasildar, the petitioner submitted the aforesaid applications dated 21.01.2016 and 05.04.2016. As no action is taken by the respondents on the applications of the petitioner, present writ petition is filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue produced written instructions stating that an extent of Ac.1.26 cents in survey No.2/2B of Kondamarajupalem Village of Thulluru Mandal is not used for agricultural purpose due to R&B link road and Gravel road was formed previously on the said land and that the R&B road is connected with Lingayapalem village and Vijayawada to Thullur main road and hence it is not possible to issue pattadar pass book and title deed to the said land.

The admitted fact is that as the petitioner made applications dated 05.04.2016 and 21.01.2016 to the respondents, it is for the Tahasildar, Tulluru to consider the said applications and pass orders in the said applications. The 4th respondent cannot keep the applications pending without passing any orders. In view of the same, the 4th respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the applications dated 05.04.2016 and 21.01.2016 in accordance with law after giving notice to the petitioner to substantiate his case, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 27.08.2016 t k