M/S Yashoda Hospitals, Rep. By Its General Manager v. Bhavya Health Services Private Limited,

[ 32e5 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY. THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO: 189 OF 2014 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dt. 01.11.2013 passed in W.P.No 26761 of 2013 on the file of the High Court. Between:

M/s Yashoda Hospitals, Somajigda, Hyderabad.

Rep. by its General Manager.

...Appella nt/Res pondent No.7 AND

1. Bhavya Health Services Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Dr. D. Pavan Kumar, S/o DVPSR Ch.Prasad, Aged about 40 years, Sri Balararn Residency, Sri Ramnagar, Eehind Jyothi Mahal Theatre, Vijaywada, Krishna Distract.

....RespondenUPetitioner

2. Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited, (AP GENCO), Rep. by its lvlanaging Director. Vidyut Soudha. Somajiguda, Hyderabad

3. Chief General Managing (HR) AP Genco Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad

4. The Executive Engineer, Civil O & IVl, Division-lll, Mothugudem, L.S.H.E.S, Vishakapatnam District

5. The Assistant Engineer/Civil, Civil O & IV, Division-|, Upper Sileru, Vishakapatnam District

6. The Executive Engineer, Civil O & Vl, SLBHES, Srisailam Dam West, Mahboobnagar District

7. The Superintending Engineer. Operation & Maintenance Circle, SRBPH APGENCO, Srisailam Project, Kurnool District

...Respondents/Respondents

Counsel for the Appellant: MS. ZAINAB KHAN FOR SRl. K. VIVEK REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : SRI N. BHARAT BABU t, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7: SRI C. RAGHU, SC FOR AP GENCO The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THI HON'BLD THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJ,A]- I'I{I,IIAN AND TH '

tION'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR FIEDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 189 of 2Ol4 JUDGMDN f : lPer the Hott'bte the Chpt .tusnt)e tL.).iat ut luat ) Ms. Zainab Khan, learned counsei for' l.he appellant submits tl at the matter has become infrr.tc:rrt,,- s. ln v erv of the above, writ appeeil is clisrn issed as infructuou s.

Misc:llaneous applications pending, rI arLl', shall stand clos,'d. However, there shall be no orde: :1s l.o costs. S Di -B.SATYAVATHI DEPTJT]T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ('tt t IiECfl6N OFFICER To,

1. One CC to S ll K VIVEK REDDY Advocate.[OPUC] 2 One CC to S 1l N BHARAT BABU Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to S tl C. RAGHU, SC FOR AP GENCO [OPUC:]

4. Two CD Cop es

5. One Spare C:py CHR.

BS rlr=-

\ HIGH COURT DATED:1210)t2022 JDUGMENT W.A.No.189 )f 2014 ,i fttE €14 ) ) , ( z 10 iAil 2U3 PATCH DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t.(& 1\\,:,