M/S Thirumala H And T Constrctors v. Central Warehousing Corporation And ANR

[ 32s3 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, TI-IE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL MISCE LLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 910 OF 2OO9 Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act against the iudgment and Decree dated 25.09.2008 made in Arb.O.P.No.958 of 2005 on the fite of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between:

M/s Thirumala H&T Contractors, rep by its Managing Partner Mr.A.Vijay Kumar Olo.1-4-134120, Kamala Nehru Colony, MahabubnagSr, A.P. ...APPELLANT AND 1 . Central Warehousing Corporation, rep by its Regional Manager PPB No.34, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. Mr.S,P-Singha, Arbitrator, Rt/o.Q-505, Anupam Apartments, East Arjun Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi - 1 10 032.

...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. N ASHOK KUMAR, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent no.1: SRI G RAMACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent no.2: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CTVIL MISCDLLANEO US No.91O of2OO9 APPEAL ORDER:- Today, when the matter is taken up for final hearing, thr: learned counscl for the appellant sr.rbmits that the :ause in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has become infructuous and no orders requirecl to be passed.

In r.ieu'of the above subrnission of the learnerl counsel fcrr the appellant, r-hc Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly dismissed as inlhrcl.uous.

No order as to costs.

Pending misccllaneous erpplicetions, if any, shall stand cio.sed.

Sd/. K. SRINIVASA JOINT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The file of the Court of the Chief Judge' City Civil Court' Hyderabad (With Records if anY) z. One cC to SRi. N ASHoK KUMAR, Advocate toPU-Cl

5. on; cc 6 sht. c RnUncHANDRA RAo, Advocate IoPUC]

4. Two CD Copies Y( pr

HIGH COURT MGP, J DATED: 0710812023

ORDER

CMA.No.910 of 2009 1g ttB 2t24 t') o J},:r 1: .i .a ..:.'1 -^ .-"

.. ..,,7 -:-:

\::-='. - .

DISMISSING THE CMA AS INFRUCTUOUS G .d* v- <--,t'f