B. Raghunandhan v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAtsAD
FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMIN ETITION NO: 3811 OF 2019 P Between Q, faghunandhan, S/o. Late B.Yadava Rao Aged 49 years, Occ,Regional president, 1104 nion C/o. Telangana Electricity Employees Uniori-1104 Varni R6ad, lrlizamabad ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT S Ashok. Aged 57 years, Occ. Tester Gr.l/SPM/Armoor, c/o. TSIVPDCL, MRT Drvrsion. Nizamabad ...RESPONDENT NO.2 /DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in Cr.No.75l20'lg, dated 19.06,2019 of p.S. Town V-Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in Cr.No.75/2019, dated 19.06.2019, of P.S. Town - V, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR , Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri Srushman Reddy,Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 The Cou( made the following: ORDER
THE HON )URABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGAFIJUN CRI],IINAL PETITION No.3811 of ?9.tLe'
ORDER:
This Cri ninal Petition is filed seeking quastLrlent of FIR in Crime No."S of 20 19 dated 19.06.2019 of Police Station Town V Nizambad, Nizambad District ;rqainst the petitioner/Acc used for the offence under Sectic n 66 (A) of l Information Tr:chnologl Act, 2008
02. Sri K.Pa,ran Kumar, iearned counsel for tlLr: petitioner and Sri S.Ga resh, learned Assistant Public Pr,rseclttor for respondent N:. I /State as well as Sri N.Srushrrurn Reddy, leaned counselfor respondent No.2 are present.
03. Sri S.Ga nesh, learned Assistant Public Pr,rsectttor for the responder t No. 1 / State has submitted a co')J' o1' Letter dated 03.71.t'.O22 addressed by Sub-lns1>ectol of Police, Nizamabad V Torvn P.S., Nizambad District, wh'erein it is stated that thl case has been referred as 'Action ltropped'on o8.o7 .2021 .
04 . Con sider ing the facts and circumstzrnces; discussed above, this Co rrt is of the opinion that since the ve'ry purpose
of filing this Crirninal Petition l-ras already been defeated and thereby this Criminal Petition is liable to be dismissed. O5. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Court of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nizamabad'
2. The Station House officer,V- Town Police station:Nizamabad,Nizmabad District.
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court For The State of Telangana' at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. One CC to SRl. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]
5. One CC to SRl. SRUSHMAN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CD Copies tsPcsd DL
HIGH COURT DATEO.30t12120i2 -'/-:--:::>\ I
ORDER
CRLP.No.3811 o 2019 DISMISSING TH : CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOt,S o {,\>r '1.\-.r,