Syed Taher Ali Hashmi v. The State Information Commissioner And 3 Others
[3219 I HIGH COURT FOR TH[, STATtr OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAI}AD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 19600 OF 2022 Between:
Syed Taher Ali Hashmi, s/o Mr Syed Kursheed Ali Hashmi Aged .36 years, occupation. business,R/o H.Ho.63- 166/608, Aramghar X Road, pillar No.3l9, Shivarmpally Village GHMC Rajendranagar circle,Ranga Reddy district, Telangana. ...PETTTTONER(S) AND
1. The State Information Commissioner, Rep by its Registrar Samachara Hakula Bhavan, Mozamzahi Market, Hyderabad 500 001 .
2. The Public Information Officer, The Tahsildar Yedpally M Bodhan, Nizamabad District Telangana.
3. The Public Relation officer, The Revenue Divisional Officer Yedpally Mandal Bodhan, Nizamabad District Telangana.
4. The State ofTelangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ol India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS the action of the respondent No.2 and 3 not gave information pertaining to file No.lr.No.G/l732109 dated 0210912009 and No objection certificate Lr.No.Gll732/09/02109/2009. Lr.No.G/I732i09 dated 26-08-2009 and the petitioner made several applications under right to information act dated L6/10/2021, ll/1012021, 2510312022 the same was received by the respondent No.2 and not furnished the information the action ofthe respondent No.2 is as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the lst Respondent to conduct enquiry under Section 193 of RTI Act and dispose olf the same for mandatory direction to the respondent no 2 for the information sought by the writ petitioner and consequently the action of the respondent No.2 and 3 as bad in law and violative of provisions of RTI Act 2005,
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. G RAJESHWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents I to 3 : GP FOR INT'ORMATION TECHNOLOGY Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.19600 of 2o22 ORDER:
Mr.G.Rajeshwar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the prcsent Writ Petition. 2.
Permission. is accorded.
3.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
4.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
i I I SD/- L.SHIVAPARVATHI ASSISTANT II.EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, l. One CC to SRI. GRAJESHWARRAO Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY' High Cou( for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetangana' [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies
// HIGH COT]R'T PMDJ DATED:0311112022 1 HE SI4 14:
( 6(>z j'
c -t 1 I ll0u ?fi22 o;
'l
ORDER
,/ WP.No.19600 of 2022 WP IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS