B.Thirumalagiri v. The District Educational Officer

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO WRlT PETITION (TR) NO: 3468 OF 2017 Between:

1. B.Thirumalagiri, S/o Janakiramulu, aged about 48 years, -l]n9mql9ye^e, (o Plot No.29, - Padmavathi Colony, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.(DSC-1998 HT.No. 23105262).

2. N.Narsaiah S/o Bbmaiah, aged about 47 years, Unemployee, Fl/o Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. (DSC-1998-HT.No.23104538) 3- P.Shashikantha, D/o Pandurungachary, aged about 45 years' Unemployee, R/o H.No.6-148/'155, Ramnagar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist., (DSC-1998HT. No. 23102869).

4. D.Mutyalu, S/o Venkaiah, aged about 48 years, Unemployee, CJo Blumoon Tailor,- Hyderabad Road, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. (DSC- 1998 HT No 23105618) ...pETtrtoNERS AND 1 . The District Educational Officer, DS-1998, Nalgonda District, At Nalgonda508001.

2. The Director of School Education, Govt. of Telangana, Hyderabad.-04.

3. The State of Telangana., rep., by its Principal Secretary, School Education Dept., Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.-04.

4. The District Collector, DSC-1998, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda-508001 . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicants are entitled for selection and appointment to the post of S.G. Teachers in DSC 1998 vacancies on par with other similarly situated persons in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A No 355/2006 and batch dated 4-12-2OO9 which was upheld by the Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No 23253 of 2010 and batch dated 18-11-2011 with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the just claim of the applicants for selection and appointment as S.G. Teachers on the ground that they have not approached this Hon'ble Tribunal and obtained similar orders is

clearly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and subversive of thr: Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES'I The Court made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE SRI JUSTTCE J. SREENTVAS RAO Writ PetitionlTRl No.3468 of 2OL7 ORDER:

{ I When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services - I, basing on the instructions submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. 2.

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed SO/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANIREGISTRAR SEcIffiI OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To l One CC to SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO' Advocate tOtl""Jru," of Tetangana, ar i iJ'i" 6d;i"-ci FbR sERVIcES-I, High court ror th Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD CoPies PSK.

SB

HIGH COURT DATED:0810912023 <.

4-.

,/ /.c tl 1'

lillra \t",.

$t1 ls s :,

ORDER

WP(TR).No.3468 of 2017 t/ DtsMtsstNG THE WR|T PETITTON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

/o )DB