Palla Karunakar v. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania Ias

[ 3304 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY.OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI,JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1O7S OF ZO2S Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to issue summons.and to punish the respondents for willfully, wantonly and deliberately failing to implement the orders dated 03.02.2025 iassed in Wp No. 2941 6f Between:

Palla Karunakar, S/o. Sriramulu, aged 62 years, Assistant Sub-lnspector of Police (Civil) (retired), Basara Zone -ll, Jagtiat ll Town pS, R/o. S-AAlOfe, Chelagal Village, Jagtial Rural Mandal, Jagtirl District. ...PETITIONER AND Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania lAS, Principal Secretary to Governrnent, Finance and Planning Department, Telangana State, Secretdriat, Hyderabad. Sri. Ravi Gq.!cta, lP_S Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Telangana State, Secretariat, Hyderaba'd.

9ri. Dr. Jitender, lPS, Director General of Police, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

J Ch. Sopiya, District Treasury Officer, Jagtial. ...CONTEMNORS Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. A TIRUPATHt cOUD Counsel for the Respondents:

The Court made the following: ORDER

.1 l!&'+aii'Y a_l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CoNTEMPT CASE No.1O75 OF 2025

ORDER

Sri A. Tirupathi Goud, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informed this Court that the respondent authorities have implemented the order ol this Court dated 03.O2.2025 passed in W.P.No.294l of 2025.

2.

Recording the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any penCing, shall also stand closed Sd/- P, CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ^IIEPUTY REGISTRAR I tf - \ ._---\- r r '\sECTloN oFFlcER //TRUE COPY// To, '1. One CC to SRl. A TIRUPATHI GOUD Advocate [OPUCI

2. Two CD Copies GR/gh

HIGH COURT DATED:0410712025 ) I \ 1 .LE. :i iA '

(nt'

1O SEP zIE :. 1

ORDER

:) \ CC.No.1075 st 2025 .'l l a ,'''l ?

a D GLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE \