← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/19499/2022disposed of no costs

Rashmitha Chengala v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

2022-04-20B.Vijaysen Reddy4 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYADERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDOY WRIT PETITION NO: 19499 OF 2022 Betwee n:

Rashmitha Chengala, w/o Purre Prasad, Age. 30 years, Occu. Secondary Grade Teacher, Address. H.No. 6-212, Konasamudram, Nizamabad District - 503307 ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, BRKRBhavan, Hyderabad

2. The Director of School Education, Saifabad, Hyderabad

3. The District Educational Officer, Nizamabad District

4. The District Educational Officer, Kamareddy Distrlct ,.,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the allotment of the Petitioner to the Kamareddy District Local Cadre by the Respondents vide orders bearing Proc. No. ES/ES/N|/KAMA/SEGR/2846 dt.22.12.2)21 and Proc No.ES/SC/KAMA/SEGR/0228 dt. 07.01 .2022 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, in violation of the principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the same and direct the Respondents to allot the Petitioner to a school in the Nizamabad District Local Cadre.

IA O:1 OF Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the appeal daled 2s.12.2021 and representation dt. 24.03.2022 filed by the Petitioner seeking change of cadre to Nizamabad District Local cadre and pass appropriate orders forthwith and communicate the same to the Petitioner.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SRIRAM POLALI Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR SERVICES-l The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19499 of 2022 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I, and perused the material on record. 2.

Learned counsel for both sides report that in similar circumstances, this Court passed orders in W.P. No.36688 of 2021 and batch dated 28.12.2021 and, in terms thereof, this writ petition may be disposed of.

3.

Therefore, recording the aforesaid submission of the learned l counsel on either side, following the order in W.P. No.36688 of 2O2l and batch dated 28. 12.2021, in terms thereof, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner's application / appeal dated 25.12,2021 and representation dated 24.3.2022 and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

//rRUEcoPYr/ -'Yil::"d?"::

mu*$m*rff[r* ::::::

To, 2.

4.

5.

6.

GBq'"7

HIGH COURT DATED:2010412022 \ d QB t,???1?2

ORDER

\ \ WP.No.19499 ot 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS "rtY'

n.-