← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWA/426/2024disposed of no costs

Y. Jaihind Reddy v. Gecka Ankitha Reddy

2024-06-05Anil Kumar Jukanti,Alok Aradhe3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.426 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 01.

05.06.2024 CJ & JAK, J I.A.No.1 of 2024 Mr. Ashok Reddy Kanathala, learned counsel representing Mr. Santhosh Challa, learned counsel for the appellant.

Ms. Ch.Vengamamba, learned counsel representing Ms.

Chintalapudi Lakshmi Kumari, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel representing Mr. R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State (hereinafter referred to as 'TSSPDCL') for respondent Nos.3 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, leave for filing this appeal is granted.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory Application is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J

I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 Mr. Ashok Reddy Kanathala, learned counsel representing Mr. Santhosh Challa, learned counsel for the appellant.

Ms. Ch.Vengamamba, learned counsel representing Ms.

Chintalapudi Lakshmi Kumari, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel representing Mr. R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State (hereinafter referred to as 'TSSPDCL') for respondent Nos.3 to 5.

Heard on I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the applications, duly supported by affidavits, requirement of filing the material documents and certified copy of the order dated 07.03.2024 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in W.P.No.167 of 2024 is dispensed with.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory Applications are allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J

W.A.No.426 of 2024 Writ Appeal is disposed of.

(vide separate Judgment) (B/o.) KL