Bashakarla Surya Teja Or Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Telangana

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI CRL.P.No.3823 of 2019 AND I.A.No.3 of 2019 ORDER:

Petitioner/accused seeks quashing of the proceedings initiated against him in C.C.No.229 of 2016 on the file of the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 66-C, D of I.T. Act, 2000 and Section 420 of I.P.C. When this matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Counsel for the petitioner/accused as well as the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant that the parties have compromised the dispute and settled the matter out of Court at the instance of elders and to that effect they filed a joint memorandum of compromise. The said joint compromise memo, which is signed by the parties and their Counsel, is accompanied by a petition i.e., I.A.No.3 of 2019. Today, both the parties were present before this Court and they were identified by their respective Counsel. This Court when examined the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant, he stated that he has settled the dispute with the petitioner/accused and, therefore, he is not interested to

prosecute the matter and that the proceedings initiated against the petitioner/accused may be quashed.

In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A. No.3 of 2019 is ordered.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings initiated against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.229 of 2016 on the file of the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI 11-07-2019 Gsn