M/S. Krishak Bharati Co-Operative Limited, v. Pemmaraju Satyanarayana Murthy,

HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS S.A.M.P. No. 1178 OF 2015 IN/AND SECOND APPEAL No.1285 OF 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT:

Learned counsel for appellants and first respondent are present. The Appellant No.1 is represented by its State Marketing Manager by name K.Hari Prakash and the respondent No.1/plaintiff is also present. Both parties filed a compromise petition to compromise the matter in S.A.No.1285 of 2010. The terms of the compromise were read over to all the parties in Telugu. All the parties in the open Court agreed that they have entered into the compromise voluntarily and with free will and without any force from any quarter. The respondent No.1/plaintiff also admits and acknowledges that he has no further claim whatsoever in this suit. On such examination, this Court is satisfied that the compromise was entered into by the parties with free will and consent, and therefore, the compromise can be recorded.

2. Accordingly, S.A.M.P.No.1178 of 2015 is ordered in terms of the joint compromise memo. Consequently, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise dated 25.03.2015 annexed to S.A.M.P.No. 1178 of 2015. The affidavit and the joint compromise memo filed in S.A.M.P.No. 1178 of 2015 shall form part of the judgment. It is needless to say that the compromise is only related to the subject-matter of the Second Appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this Second Appeal shall stand closed.

_​_______________ ANIS, J Date: 07.04.2016 Anr THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANIS

S.A.M.P. No. 1178 OF 2015 IN/AND SECOND APPEAL No. 1285 OF 2010 07.04.2016 Anr