Jogipeta Bhaskar v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.14041 OF 2019 DATED :10.07.2019 Between :

Jogipeta Bhaskar S/o.Satyanarayana, Aged about 47 yrs, Occu : Agriculture, R/o.2-1-36/4, Near Hanuman Temple, Shamshiguda, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

..

Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.

.. Respondents This court made the following :

- 2 - THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.14041 OF 2019 ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 8. 2.

Petitioner claims to be the owner and in possession of agricultural land to an extent of Ac.5-15 guntas in Sy.No.285/E Situated at Chitkul Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, having claimed to have purchased the same by way of registered sale deed dated 13.03.2014. His name was mutated in the revenue records and he was also issued pattadar pass books. Petitioner further submits that when the real estate company was claiming the property, he instituted O.S.No.95 of 2015 in the Court of Family Judge-cum-VII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sanga Reddy, for the relief of declaration of title and the suit was decreed in his favour, on 31.01.2017.

Petitioner now alleges that certain persons have created fictitious sale transactions on the very same property in order to grab the property and now they are in the process of applying for conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purpose and also to enter into sale transaction on the said property. Therefore, petitioner filed applications before the revenue authorities as well as before the registering authorities not to entertain applications for conversion of land for non-agricultural purpose and also not to entertain the deeds of conveyance on the subject property.

Alleging inaction on the said

- 3 - representations and trying to accept conversion application, for registration this writ petition is filed.

3.

As briefly noted above and a reading of the prayer itself makes it clear that so far no orders are passed. But petitioner apprehends order for conversion of land for non-agricultural purpose and trying to accept the documents for registration. Thus, as the prayer is against the future events, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. It cannot be said that petitioner is remediless as and when such decisions are made by the competent authorities.

4.

Thus, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies, as available in law, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 10th July, 2019 Rds