Thati Reddy Swarnalatha, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.27893 of 2016 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the second respondent in disposing of the revision petition filed by the petitioner on 04.07.2016 as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh).

3. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner herein filed a revision petition before the second respondent on 04.07.2016 challenging the orders passed by the third respondent in Rc.CS2/78/2016 dated 23.06.2016 wherein and whereby the orders passed by the fourth respondent were confirmed.

4. At the time of arguments, the only relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner is to direct the second respondent to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner as early as possible. The learned Assistant Government Pleader also consented for the same.

5. In view of the submissions made by both the counsel, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the main case.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the second respondent is hereby directed to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner on 04.07.2016 challenging the orders dated 23.06.2016 passed by the third respondent, after affording an opportunity to her to put forth her stand, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to

costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

______________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J August 19, 2016.

Note:

Issue C.C. within one week.

B/o.Rns