← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCMA/368/2018dismissed

Basavaraj Srinivas v. Matta Krishna Reddy

2018-08-30C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy,Gudiseva Shyam Prasad3 pages

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy and The Hon'ble Sri Justice Gudiseva Shyam Prasad CMA.Nos.368 & 529 of 2018 Date: 30.08.2018 Between:

Basavaraj Srinivas ..Appellant and Matta Krishna Reddy and 6 others ..Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr.MV.Suresh Kumar, Sr.Counsel for Mr.K.Suresh Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr.Mahesh Kumar Counsel for respondent No.2: Mr.Ashok Kumar Agarwal Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 7: Mr.Ram Mohan Palan for Mr.U.Shanti Bhushan Rao The Court made the following:

CVNR,J & GSP,J CMA.Nos.368 & 529 of 2018 Dt: 30.08.2018 Common Judgment: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) These two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals (CMAs) arise out of Common Order, dated 15-03-2018, in IA.Nos.351 and 352 of 2016 in OS.No.175 of 2016 on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Bhongir.

After arguing the case, Mr.M.V.Suresh Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.K.Suresh Reddy, learned Counsel for the appellant in both these CMAs, submitted that his client does not intend to press these CMAs on merits. He has, however, requested that the constructions, if any made by the respondents on the suit schedule property or any part thereof, pending the suit, may be made subject to its result.

In the light of the above submission, both these CMAs are dismissed, however, with the observation that the constructions, if any made by the respondents on the suit schedule property or any part thereof, during the pendency of the suit, shall be subject to its result.

As a sequel to dismissal of the CMAs, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, stand disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _______________________ (Gudiseva Shyam Prasad, J) Dt: 30th August, 2018 lur

CVNR,J & GSP,J CMA.Nos.368 & 529 of 2018 Dt: 30.08.2018