← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/6302/2026allowed no costs

Amgoth Devidas, v. The State Of Telangana,

2026-04-30K. Sujana5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6302 of 2026 DATE: 30.04.2026 Between:

Amgoth Devidas .... Petitioner/accused No.2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through P.S. IV-Town, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.

.... Respondent/Complainant ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail, who is arrayed as accused No.2 in Crime No.116 of 2026 of IV-Town Nizamabad Police Station, Nizamabad District, registered for the offences punishable under Section 143(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act, 1956.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that, on the basis of the alleged credible information, the police conducted a raid at a house situated at Sai Priya Nagar. During the course of the raid, the police found Accused Nos.1 and 2 along with other persons present at the premises. It is further stated that the victims informed the Investigating Officer that they were carrying on activities at the instance of Accused Nos.1 and 2, and that Accused Nos.1 and 2 were acting as the organizers of such activities. Basing on the same, the police registered a case for the above said offences.

3.

Heard Sri B. Surendar Naik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and he is falsely implicated in the present case and he is in jail since 28.03.2026 and the material part of the investigation is already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to him by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the

petitioner stating that the allegations against the petitioner herein are serious in nature and the petitioner herein is an organizer in the said crime. Further, the investigation is not yet completed. However, he informed that there are no other cases pending against the petitioner herein. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner herein is in jail since 28.03.2026. As seen from the remand case diary, the prosecution witnesses, LWs 1 to 10 including the investigating authority have already been examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judicial First Class (Mobile) Magistrate, at Nizamabad.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 30.04.2026 TU

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6302 of 2026 Date:30.04.2026 TU