S.Sai Ram v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE JUSTI CE G. SRI DEVI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No. 3 8 8 5 of 2 0 1 9 ORDER :

This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/ accused, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.171 of 2019 of Begumpet Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of IPC.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/ State and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the de facto complainant instead of filing of suit for recovery of money against the petitioner has filed the present case with false allegations with an intention to harass the petitioner. The transaction between the petitioner and the de facto complainant is purely civil in nature. There is no wrongful gain to the petitioner. The de facto complainant with a mala fide intention has filed the present case. The petitioner has not committed any breach of trust as alleged by the de facto complainant. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.

Though it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has borrowed an amount of Rs.15,41,150/ - and repaid an amount of Rs.15,34,000/ - to the de facto complainant

bank account, no material or evidence whatsoever is produced by the petitioner in support of his contention.

6.

Having regard to the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ___________________ JUSTI CE G. SRI DEVI 18.07.2019 ssp