Smt.Ananthula (Mallarapu)Varalaxmi v. The State Of Telanagana

[ 3158 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3944 OF 2019 Between:

Smt Ananthula (Mallarapu)Varalaxmi, - Petitioner/Accused No.4 AND The state of Telanagana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, Hrgh Court, Hyderabad RespondenUCom plainant .\HE S o?

o Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the concerned Police to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Cr. No. 389 of 201 9 on the file of the Jagadgirigutta Police Station, Cyberabad in the interest of Justice Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI Counselfor the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI / This Crim nal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procr;dure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/A4, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.389 of 2019 of Jagadgirigutta Police Station, CyLrerabad, registered for the offences under Sections 498-,\, 304-8 IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A4, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State and perused the record.

3.

lt is alleg ec in the complaint that all the accused had harassed the daughter c,f the de-facto complainant by demanding additional dowry and forced to give divorce to 41 , thereby, her daughter committed suicide by hanging in her in-laws house. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/A4 would submit that the petitioner has treen falsely implicated in the case as the contents of the complaint eue'far away from bona fide truth. He further submits that she is no vray concerned with the family affairs of the deceased I and 41 and sher is residing separately at distant house and is looking after her parents-in-law and her attendance is very much required in their house and thus, he prays to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

5.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the nature of allegations leveled against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A4 on some conditions.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/A4 is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Jagadgirigutta Police Station, Cyberabad, within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner/A4 on bail, on her executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.'10,0001 (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to his satisfaction. On such release, the petitioner/A4 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C and co-operate with the investigating officer in investigating the case. 8.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed I SN/. CH.VENKATESWARLU ASS!S'I'A R ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// F OT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 XV Addrtional tVletropolitan sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District' 2 Xl Additionat Hletropoiiian tVlagistrate Pralhanth Nagar' Kukatpally' Cyberabad.

3 The Station House Officer, Jagadgirigutta Police Station' Cyberabad ; o.; cc to snt. sREENIvASA nno RAVULAPATI Advocate loPUCl 5 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG), High court at Hyderabad lourl

6. One SPare CoPY

HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:19/071201) CRLP.No.3944 of 2C19 B,\ II, c\