← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/14209/2019disposed of no costs

Kammari Nagesh v. The State Of Telangana

2019-07-11P Naveen Rao4 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.14209 & 14211 of 2019 Date:11.07.2019 W.P.No.14209 of 2019 Between:

Kammari Nagesh, S/o. Kammari Bheemaiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o.2-72/1, Vanjiri, Mandal Kagaznagar, Vanjiri, Tungeda, Kumaram Bheem Asifabad District, Telangana State and others .. Petitioners And The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Telangana State Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents The Court made the following:

- 2 - THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.14209 & 14211 of 2019 COMMON ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, learned Government Pleader for Forests and learned Assistant Solicitor General. 2.

Petitioners claim that they were assigned lands in Survey Nos.5/AA/2, 13, 17E/2/2, 17/E3/2, 17/E4, 145/199, 24/A2, 27/1/1, 145/35/2, 145/36/1, 145/63, 27/2, 27/1/3, 66/2, 101/2, 117/2, 119/2, 145/12/2, 145/43, 84/1/1, 86/AA/1/2, 145/29, 145/37, 145/35/4, 145/36/3, 145/30, 145/51, 145/38, 145/13/2, 145/44, 145/50, 145/62, 145/52, 145/53, 145/54, 145/56, 145/57, 145/58, 145/59, 145/65, 145/70, 145/187, 145/39, 145/193, 145/182, 145/191, 27/1/2, 145/35/3, 145/36/2, 145/40, 145/203, 145/96, 145/195, 145/201, 145/35/1, 145/183, 145/186, 145/190, 145/48, 145/61, 145/67, 145/74, 145/188, 145/189, 145/194, 145/198, 145/202, 146/25, 145/208, 145/210, 145/197, 145/66, 145/85, 145/192 and 145/207 in Ankusapur Village, Survey No.

16, 16/AA, 26/6, 26/5, 26/9, 26/10, 26/12, 26/7, 61/3, 66/6, 67/4, 67/12, 67/5, 67/4/AA, 67/11 and 67/14 in Naarapur Village, Survey No.45/2 and 55/5 Matepalli Village, situated in Kagaznagar Mandal Kumarambheem Asifabad District, Telangana State. They are in enjoyment of the said lands for several years.

- 3 - lands and preventing them from carrying on their cultivation activity and the same is ex facie illegal.

3.

According to Sri R. Sameer Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.14211 of 2019, some of the petitioners were also granted Recognition of Forest Rights (ROFR) and even those persons are also not allowed to enter into their lands. 4.

Learned Government Pleader for Forests, on instructions, submits that insofar as the persons in whose favour ROFR is granted, the Forest Department is not interfering with their activities. She further submits that recently, survey was conducted and in the said survey, it was found that several persons have encroached into the forest land and having been found that there are encroachments, the Forest Department is taking steps in accordance with law and due opportunity will be afforded to such of those persons who claimed to be in occupation of the forest land.

5.

That being so, the apprehension expressed by the petitioners is not valid.

6.

Having regard to the same, while leaving it open to the officials of the Forest Department to take all measures to protect the Forest area and prevent encroachments, before evicting any person who is alleged to be in occupation of forest land, they shall follow due process and without following due process, no petitioner be harassed.

- 4 - 7.

With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petitions accordingly disposed of. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:11.07.2019 KH