Smt Shaik Gousiyabee , Gousiya v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 5494 oF 2021 Between:

Smt Shaik Gousiya Housewife, Rl/o. H.

Malkajgiri District.

bee @ Gousiya, W/o Shaik Chand, Aged about 52 yerrs, Otc No. 3.1 138/1 , Singaipally, Hakimpet, Shamirpet Mandal, Medchat- ,..PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ,..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of arrest by the Jawaharnagar Police Station Rachakonda in Crime No. 214 of 2021 on such terms. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N/. V. Raj Kumar Gabriel, Advocale for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5494 OF 2O2I ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminai Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), is filed by the petitioner/ accused, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.214 of 2O2l of P.S. Jawaharnagar, Rachakonda, registered for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondentState and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused would submit that the petitioner is innocent of the offence and she is no way ( concerned with the alleged offence. The petitioner/ accused is a law-abiding citizen and is prepared to abide by any condition which this Court may deem fit to impose in case of granting anticipatory bail. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/ accused.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/ accused.

As seen from the FIR and other material papers available on record, there are specific allegations against the petitioner. Thus, looking into the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner/ accused and her involvement in commission of the present crime and the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/ accused.

The Criminal Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, if the petitioner/accused surrenders before the competent Court within a period of fifteen days from today and applies for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the said Court, in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //rRUE COPY/'

tt_/ I I SECTION OFFICER To, .1'TheVAdditionalMetropolitanSessionsJudge,RangaReddyDistrictatL.B.Nagar. i. rii" Stutio" Aouse Offiber, Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda ' Ranga Reddy District.

3. Til 6bii; dublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hvderabad.( OUT) +. oi'"-cCio Sri. ttrt.'v. Rai Kumar Gabriel, Advocate toPucl

5. Two CD CoPies

6. One Spare CoPY Kul gbr \ \ V i

HIGH COURT DATED: 2710712021 -rAr€ S L \ ) o i.) 3 0 Jut20tl C) * PA:I * o s

ORDER

CRLP.No.5494 of 202'l DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION )f)