Syed Ahmed All , Abrar v. State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE JUSTI CE G. SRI DEVI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No. 3 9 0 8 of 2 0 1 9 ORDER :

This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/ A.1, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.58 of 2019 of Narayanaguda Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Section 328 of IPC and Sections 4 and 20(2) COTP Act and Sections 3 and 4 of A.P. Gaming Act.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/ A.1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/ State and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no way concerned with the aforesaid crime. The petitioner did not commit any offences. The allegations levelled against him are false and fabricated and he is falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.

The material placed on record reveals that the petitioner is illegally running the Hookah centre, organising gaming house and allowing the minors to consume Hookah by violating the rules laid down by the concerned authorities. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious and severe in nature. Hence, he is not entitled for anticipatory bail.

6.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner/ A.1 surrenders before the Court below concerned within ten days and move an application for regular bail, after giving prior notice to the Public Prosecutor concerned, the same may be considered in accordance with law.

___________________ JUSTI CE G. SRI DEVI 18.07.2019 ssp