Yesubabu Naidu Or M.Y Naidu v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI of and .

Nos .

.I and Crl.P.No.3977 of 2019 COMMON ORDER The criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.411 of 2018 of Saidabad Police Station, Hyderabad District, registered for the offences under Sections 448, 354, 506 IPC and under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SCs and STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'), against the petitioner/accused. 2.

I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2019 are filed under Sections 320(6) and 320(2) of Cr.P.C., by both parties seeking leave of this Court to compound the offences and to record compromise as the matter was settled out of the Court due to intervention of the elders and well-wishers. They stated that there are no disputes between the parties and therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings in the aforesaid case.

3.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the second respondent/de-facto complainant and the petitioner/accused are present and they are identified by their respective counsel. When this Court enquired the parties, the de-facto complainant and the accused stated that they entered into compromise due to intervention of the elders.

4. Though the offence under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Act alleged against the petitioner is non-compoundable, by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., and as the offence is not against the society, I find that it is a fit case to grant leave to the parties to compound the offences and to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused.

5. In the result, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2019 are ordered. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Cr.No.411 of 2018 on the file of Saidabad Police Station, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in the criminal petition, shall stand closed.

_____________ G. SRI DEVI, J 15th July, 2019 sj