B. Shivraj, v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CRI MI NAL REVI SI ON CASE No.2270 OF 2016 ORDER:

The present Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, aggrieved by the docket order dated 27.07.2016, passed in Crl.M.P.No.558 of 2016 by the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy, in connection with Crime No.285 of 2016 of Ramachandrapuram Police Station.

2.

A perusal of the record would show that by an order dated 22.07.2016 the petitioner was granted bail by the Judge, Family Court-cum-VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy, with a further condition to attend before the Station House Officer, Ramachandrapuram Police Station, everyday between 10:00 A.M., and 4:00 P.M., till filing of charge sheet.

3.

Heard.

4.

Grievance of the petitioner is that when he went to furnish sureties as ordered by the Court, the same were returned on the ground that the petitioner has to furnish two local sureties. But, that does not appear to be the purport of the order dated 22.07.2016 passed by the learned Judge.

CPK,J CrlRC_2270_2016 4.

Since the order dated 27.07.2016 does not anywhere clearly indicate that the petitioner is required to furnish local sureties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner shall furnish suitable security on or before 26.09.2016 and the learned Magistrate shall consider the same, in accordance with law. If the learned Magistrate is not inclined to accept the sureties, a detailed order may be passed to that effect. 5.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. _______________________ JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:20.09.2016 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow (B/O) INL