Smt.Dr.C.Bharathi, v. The State Of Telangana And 2 Others

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.14421 of 2019 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief :- " .....to issue a Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not disposing of the representations dated 26.10.2015 and 24.06.2019 made by the Petitioner seeking regularization of her services to the post of Junior Lecturer in Economics in the 3rd Respondent College and admit the post to grant in aid even though there are clear S.C.(W) Backlog Vacancies and she is having the requisite qualifications and has been working since last 18 years, as illegal, arbitrary, bad, opposed to Principles of Natural Justice, Contrary to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to regularize her services to the post of Junior Lecturer in Economics in the 3rd Respondent College and admit the post to grant in aid by passing necessary orders or issuing G.O......." . Heard Mr.A.Abhishek Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education.

It has been contended by the petitioner that she is fully eligible and qualified to be appointed to the post of Junior Lecturer in Economics and she was appointed as a part-time Junior Lecturer in the 3rd respondent College on 20.11.2000 and since then, she has been discharging her duties to the best satisfaction of her superiors and everyone concerned. The petitioner submits that she belongs to the Scheduled Caste community and the 3rd respondent college is admitted into grant-in-aid. The petitioner further submits that one

aided vacancy arose in the 3rd respondent College during the year 2003 consequent upon retirement of an aided lecturer and since then, the 3rd respondent is extracting work from her in an aided vacancy and the 3rd respondent has submitted proposal to respondents 1 and 2 for absorption of the petitioner into aided vacancy. Since the proposal submitted by the 3rd respondent has not been considered by respondents 1 and 2, the petitioner has submitted representations to the respondents on 26.10.2015 and 24.06.2019 and the 2nd respondent was pleased to consider the said representations and forwarded the proposal to the 1st respondent on 10.07.2018 for regularising the services of the petitioner and also for absorption into aided vacancy, but, so far, the 1st respondent has not passed any orders on the proposal submitted by the 2nd respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate orders be passed in the writ petition directing the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal submitted by the 2nd respondent on 10.07.2018 by considering the case of the petitioner for absorption into aided vacancy.

Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has contended that the 1st respondent will consider the proposal submitted by the 2nd respondent and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law.

This Court, having considered the rival submissions, is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the proposal submitted by the 2nd respondent on 10.07.2018 and pass appropriate orders in

accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J Date: 22-07-2019 Prv