Naini Pratap Reddy, v. Sri. Anil

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO.952 OF 2018

O R D E R

Counsel for the petitioner states that after the Contempt Case is filed, the respondents have stopped interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject property and that the petitioner therefore does not wish to press the Contempt Case. 2.

Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. ____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 8th NOVEMBER, 2019 Svv