Khair Unnisa Begum W/O Mohd. Faiyaz Uddin Khan v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.37 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With their consent, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 2.

The present writ petition came to be filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in not disposing the representation dated 17.11.2016 made by the petitioners seeking issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds, as illegal and arbitrary.

3.

Learned Government Pleader for revenue would submit that the land in dispute is an evacuee property and as such question of issuance of pattadar pass book and title deed does not arise. But, however, the learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the same. 4.

Having regard to the above, the Tahsildar-respondent No.4 shall deal with the application dated 17.11.2016 made by the petitioners seeking issuance of pattadar pass book and title deed, in accordance with law, at the earliest. It is needless to mention that the Tahsildar shall hear the petitioner as well as the aggrieved persons, if any, including the Government authority before passing any orders. If the Tahsildar is not intending to issue pattadar pass book and title deeds, he shall pass a detailed order stating reasons and communicate a copy of the same to the petitioner.

CPK,J WP_37_2017 5.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_______________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:03.01.2017 vhb