Akramulla Khan v. The State Of Telangana

WRIT PETITION No.16668 of 2021 Date:23.07.2021 Between:

Akramulla Khan S/o Hazi Maden Khan, aged about 57 years, residing at Tandur, Mancherial Dist .....Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Registration and Stamps Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

.....Respondents The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.16668 OF 2021 ORDER :

This writ petition is filed with a prayer to grant the following relief:

" to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in entertaining and registering the Sale Deed dt 10.07.2019 vide Doc No. 10435 of 2019 produced by the 5th respondent executed in favour of the 6th respondent in respect of the Schedule Property depriving the 10 percentage legitimate share of the petitioner out of the schedule property though the 5th respondent has no exclusive right over the same as he is having only 75% share in the schedule property as illegal arbitrary violative of Principles of Natural Justice apart from violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Sri P.Sajan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by registration of deed of conveyance dated 10.07.2019 executed by the fifth respondent in favour of the sixth respondent in respect of the subject property. 4.

Though learned counsel for the petitioner sought to contend that such execution was contrary to the terms of partnership deed entered into between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. In a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution, this Court cannot go into rival dispute of violation of terms of partnership firm and all other disputes inter se. Therefore, if the petitioner has grievance against the fifth respondent executing deed of conveyance in favour of the sixth respondent on a property concerning partnership firm without his consent and/or knowledge, it is for the petitioner to work out remedies as available in civil law.

5. Granting said liberty, this writ petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

___________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J 23.07.2021 Nvl

WRIT PETITION No.16668 of 2021 Date: 23.07.2021 Nvl