G. Prashamshini v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 16672 OF 2021 Between:

G. Prashamshini, D/o Madhu, Aged about 22 years, Occ. Student, Rl/o H. No.1-1191/5, JJ Colony, Suryapet, Suryapet District. ,..PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secreteriat, Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, Lakidikapul, Hyderabad.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Suryapet District.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Suryapet, Suryapet District.

5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Atmakur (S), Suryapet District.

6. Arempula Mybooba, W/o Ramulu Aged about 45 years, Patarla Pahad village, Athmakur (S) lVandal, Suryapet District.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a seeking a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents No.S to produce the Petitioners uncle (brother of Petitioner's father) G. Shanthaiah S/o Devaiah and Petitioners brother G. Natesh S/o Shanthaiah, before this Honble court and further declare the action of the Respondent No,5 in detaining the Uncle and brother of the Petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia, Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP for HOME for ADVOGATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.6: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEKREDDY w.P.NO.16672 0F 2021 O R D E R rPertheHon,hr e Sri Justice A.Rsissheker Reddl) Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. filed written instructions of the 5'h respondent stating that the petitioner was called to the police station on 17.01 .2021 in the morning hours to know the address of the accused in Cr.No. I 1 8 of 2021 and after collecting the required information, the petitioner was let ofl'on the same day and that they never arrested the petitioner, nor detained her Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Recording the above submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader fbr Home, the writ petition is closed. However, it is open to the petitioner to avail remedies available under law, if she is still aggrieved.

Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SDTI.NAGALAKSHMI ASSIS'I'ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'

sEcfloN ovi"=* To,

1. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High court for the State of Telangana [oUT]

2. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP for Home High Court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad (ouT)

4. Two C.D. CoPies.

5. One SPare CoPY.

MRC Ask

HIGH COURT DATED:2610712O21 ,r1e Sr a I"-X"

ORDER

* I WP.No.16672 ol 2021 C, ( ) 0 3 otI?s21 ,\ \ CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -x\y