Bandari Bhagya Laxmi v. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania Ias

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 611 0F 2022 contempt case Under sections 10 lo 12 of contempt of courts Act to Punish the Respondent herein for willful and deliberate violation of the Orders of the High Court dated 02.02.2022 in I.A. No. 1 ot 2022 in W. P. No.460 6 ot 2022' Between:

BandariBhagyaLaxmi,WoV.Srinivas,agedAbout36years,SchoolAsst (SS), Z. P. H.S-.- Chinanarsapaly, K. B.Asifabad District' ... Petitioner/Petitioner AND Sri sandeep Kumar Sultania lAS, Principal secretary, School Education Dept, State of Te[angana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...ResPondenU R-5 in main W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES -l The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No. 6lL of 2022 ORDER:

1. This Contempt Case has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dt.O2.O2.2022 in IA.No.l of 2022 in W.P.No.46O6 of 2022.

2.

When the matter is taken up hearing, thc learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents has placed before this Court copy of Memo No.Spl/Secretary Peshi/202 l-522, dL.O7.O7.2022, under the signature of the Secretary to Government, whereby it is stated that the appeal preferred by the petitioner was allowed and petitioner was found to be eligible for consideration in terms of G.O.Ms. No.317 cAD (SPP-I) Dept. dt. 06.12.2O2L, and Circular Memo No. 1655/ SPF.I / 2o2r -7, dt.23. t2.2O2t.

3.

Learned Government Pleader further submits that though there has been some delay in implementing the above said order, the same is purely on account of administrative reasons and is neithcr willful nor wanton.

I 4.

Having regard to the fact that the respondents, though with some delay, have complied with the above order passed by this Court, this Contempt Case is closed' Further, since the petitioner's case was found eligible for consideration, it is incumbent on the part of the District Collector and the District Educational Officer, concerned, to issue consequential proceedings, as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs.

5.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.

SD/-A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Two CCs to the GP for Services-|, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. One CC to Sii K. Narayana, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies

4. One Spare CoPY 'y

HIGH COURT DATED: 0810712022 ,4: ..rrr- : t,t- ;

o'

\ ( 2 7 Atlff ?0?2 .1

ORDER

C.C.No.611 ot 2022 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS Yofl rb ''