Jupudi Sunil Kumar, v. The State Of Telangana,

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRL.M.P.NO.7539 OF 2015 AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.13456 OF 2014 COMMON ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A2 to A4 under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.430 of 2013 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad, wherein cognizance was taken for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 I.P.C.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for respondents.

Pending the Criminal Petition, the de facto complainant filed petition seeking permission of the Court to compound the offence.

The accused and the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant are present before the Court and they are identified by their respective counsel. They filed joint compromise memo along with affidavit of the de facto complainant stating that they amicably settled the matter outside the Court at the intervention of elders. Hence, permission to be accorded to compound the offence.

Having regard to the said circumstances, the complainant is permitted to compound the offence with the accused pending criminal petition before this Court.

Accordingly, Crl.M.P.No.7539 of 2015 is ordered and the Criminal Petition is allowed by quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.430 of 2013 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J Date: 31-07-2015 pab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ***** CRIMINAL PETITION No.13456 OF 2014 Between:

Jupudi Sunil Kumar ... Petitioner and The State of Telangana, rep., by Public Prosecutor and another ... Respondents DATE OF JUDGEMENT PRONOUNCED: 31-07-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No 3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No