S.Srinivasa Reddy v. High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND + WRI T PETI TI ON No.41589 of 2016 % Date: 08-08-2017 # Betw een:

1. S. Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. S. Ram Reddy, Occ: Superintendent, Additional Junior Civil Judge Court, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.

2. Vajram S/o. Shankaraiah, Occ: Superintendent, Principal Junior Civil Judge Court, Kalwakurthy, Mahabubnagar District.

3. K. parshavedi S/o. Late K. Ampanna, Superintendent, Prohibition & Excise Court, Mahabubnagar District. ( now working on deputation at Principal Senior Civil Judge Court, Mahabubnagar) ... Petitioners And

1. High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Building, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar-Administration.

2. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar District, Mahabubnagar.

... Respondents ! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mrs. K. Udaya Sri ^ Counsel for the Respondents : Bobba Vijayalakshmi < GI ST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred ]

VRS,J & TR,J W.P.No.41589/2016 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN And WRI T PETI TI ON No.41589 of 2016 ORDER: (Per VRS,J) The petitioners have come up with the above writ petition challenging a clarification issued by this Court and a consequential order of repatriation.

2. Heard Mrs. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Bobba Vijayalakshmi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

3. The petitioners herein were originally appointed as Steno Typists, respectively on 18.06.1990, 18.06.1990 and 08.04.1991. They were promoted to the post of Senior Assistant on 26.11.2012. But after the issue of G.O.Ms.No.100, dated 08.08.2013, they were redesignated as Stenographers Grade-III w.e.f. 01.04.2003 and were granted upgradation to Grade-II and Grade-I by order dated 14.02.2014, but with retrospective effect.

4. However, after a clarification issued by the Registry of this Court, they were repatriated to the post of Senior Assistant, forcing them to come up with the above writ petition.

5. The issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of a Bench of this Court in W.P.No.12680 of 2015. Therefore, following the same, this writ petition is also allowed. The orders of repatriation and the consequential orders are set aside. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

____________ T. RAJANI , J.

Js.

8th August, 2017.

VRS,J & TR,J W.P.No.41589/2016 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND W.P.No.41589 of 2016 (Per VRS,J) 8th August, 2017 Js.