← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/1680/2016disposed of no costs

Shakeel Jabbar v. The State Of Telangana,

2016-07-12Raja Elango1 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1680 OF 2016 ORDER:

The petitioners/A.2 to A.4 have preferred the present criminal revision case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.,) being aggrieved by the order dated 03.05.2016 passed in S.C.No.125 of 2015 by the Court of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989-cum-VII Additional Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar, whereby the learned Sessions Judge framed the charges against A.1 to A.10. Heard and perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for sometime, sought permission of this Court to give liberty to the petitioners to raise all the grounds raised herein and also sought to dispense with the presence of the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 before the Court below.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are given liberty to raise all the grounds, which are raised herein, before the Court below during the course of trial. As the question of identity of the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 does not arise, the presence of the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 before the trial Court is dispensed with except on the date of framing of charges and answer the charges under Section 313 CrPC. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions pending in this petition, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 12.07.