Smt. Seethamma v. Shanmuga Srinivasa Raja Rajeshwari Enterprises And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

N/ONDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1827 OF 2013 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated'1 9-3-2013 in EA NO. 15 of 2012 in EA NO.9 of 2010 in EP No. 12 ol 2008 in OS NO. 1265 of 2001, on the file of the Court of the Additional Rent Controller-Cum-1 8th Junior Civil Judge at Secunderabad. Between Smt. Seethamma, W/o. Late Kali Kumar Verma, Occ:Housewife, R/o.H.No.10-1-569/49,TlT,lt4aredpally,Secunderabad ...'ETIT,ONER AND

1. Shanmuga Srinivasa Raja Rajeshwari Enterprises, Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr. Rama Krishna, Fl/o. Maredpally, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT/DHR

2. M.V.L.N.Raju @ Ramu,, S/o. Late Kali Kumar, Occ: Nil, Ri/o. H.No. 10-1--569/49, TlT, Maredpally, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/JDR CRPMP. NO: 2456 OF 2013 Petition under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in EP No. 12 of 2008 in OS NO. 1265 of 2001 on the file of the Hon'ble Additional Rent Controller Cum XVlll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition.

For the Petitioner : SRl. THUMU CHANDRA SHEKAR, Advocate For the Respondent :SRl R PAVAN REDDY, Advocate The Court made the following : ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1827 of 2013

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is arising out of the order dated.19.03.2013 passed in E.A.No.15ol 2012 in E.PNo.9of 2010 in E.P.No.12 of 2008 in O.S.No.1265 of 2001 on the file of Additional Rent Controller-cum-1Bth Junior Civil Judge, Secunderabad 2.

E.A No.15 of 2012 was filed before the trial a court to condone the delay of 736 days in filing the restoration petition in E.A.No.10 of 2010 and the said petition was dismissed on 19.03.2013 3.

The learned Counsel for the respondent/Decree Holder stated that the matter was settled outside the court and the revision petitioner has paid Rs.1,40,0001 through a Demand Draft bearing No 973624 towards full satisfaction of the decreetal amount and therefore E.P was withdrawn before the trial court on 31 .07.2013. ln order to substantiate his contention the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner has filed daily case status of the trial court relating to the E.P. Even the case status of the trial court also disclose that E.P No.12 of 2008 was dismissed as withdrawn 4.

Accordingly, recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs

GA C CRP No.1827 of 2A13 5.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/-T.KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// @ To, SECTION OFFICER The Additional Rent Controller-Cum-18th Junior Civil Judge at Secunderabad. One CC to SRl. THUMU CHANDRA SHEKAR Advocate IOPUCI One CC to SRl. R PAVAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies One Spare Copy SB $-

.q HIGH COURT DATED:1 310612022 -:::_EcI t,1 J.

l 2s [[B ?$IL :.)

ORDER

CRP.No.1827 ot 2013 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 1e t