Vinay Singh v. The State Of Telangana,

\ [ 3251 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO:

oF 2018 Between:

Vinay Singh, Occ Hyderabad.

Financial Advisor, R:/o.H.No.14-10-395, Jumaragh, Dhoolpit, ...PETITIONERYACCUSED NO.2 AND The State of Telangana,, Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

Mohd. Abdul Kaleem, Occ.Business, Rl/o. H.No.3-1-312l1 Nimboliadda, Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C C.No. 1686/2016 on the file of the file of the lV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad against the Petitioner /Accused No. 2 herein in the facts and circumstances stated above and in the interest of justice l.A NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay C. C NO. '1686/2016 on the file of the File of the tV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad in the facts and circumslances stated above and in the interest of justice This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P VINOD LAL ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 None Appeared for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMNNAL PETITION NO. 4445 of 2018 ORDER:

t t This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr'P.C.'), is filed by the petitioner - accused No.2 to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.1686 of 2018 on the file of learned IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad registered for the offence under Section 338 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 50, i80, 181 and 196 of Motor Vehicles Act.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that examination of the witnesses is almost completed and Investigation Officer yet to be examined.

3.

The grounds raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the factual issues can be decided in the trial Court. I do not find any reason to keep this criminal petition pending. 4.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed off.

t_'1" r Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD,.MOHD.ISMAIL AsstsiAllNGrsrRAK \ ,ITRUE COPY'I SECTTON OFFICER '"1ili^r;$$tf{j:,,i}fl'g::',::#,,f i'i:*Fr*[{ts:*:1l+?Eral;'"' . t'"t"tttS SX"t u'*o' LAL' Advocate [oPUCl RUBI s. 1r,o co Q;8

t I HIGH COURT DATED:0911012023 or I 6(4 c) t, ..,.&t s $ ar '(( o t_;

ji- .'.. t-t 11 ,,,

ORDER

CRLP.No.4445 of 2018 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OFF g a (9 rts