Sadu Venkateswara Reddy, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO W.P.Nos.16201, 11216, 10066 OF 2015 W.P.No.16201 OF 2015 Between:

Tutika Parvateesam S/o. Radhakrishna, R/o. Telukula street, Nellimarla Village and Mandal, Vizianagaram District.

..... Petitioner AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, & Ex-Officio Project Director, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, Andhra Pradesh, 3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Zone- I, Kakinada Region.

.....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing appointment orders to the petitioner to the post of TGT (Social Studies) in Zone I, AP Model Schools in-spite of the selection by issuing the proceedings Lr.Rc.No.2101/A3/2013, dt. 02.04.2015 is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India by setting aside the same, and consequently, direct the respondents to issue appointment order to the petitioner as TGT (Social Studies);

W.P.No.11216 OF 2015 Between:

Sadu Venkateswara Reddy S/o. Guruva Reddy, R/ o. H No. 1-52, Uma Maheswarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... Petitioner AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, School Education Department, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, & Ex-Officio Project Director, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, Andhra Pradesh, 3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur. .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing appointment orders to the petitioner to the post of TGT (Social Studies) in Zone III, AP Model Schools in-spite of the selection is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently, direct the respondents to issue appointment order to the petitioner as TGT (Social Studies); W.P.No.10066 OF 2015 Between:

1 G. Sridhar S/o. Saidaiah.

2 Ch. Venkateswara Rao S/o. Kannaiah 3 P. Suneetha D/o. Madhava Rao 4 A. Srujana D/o. Punnaiah 5 M. Kasiramulu S/o. Narayana.

..... Petitioners AND 4 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, School Education Department, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, & Ex-Officio Project Director, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, Andhra Pradesh, 6 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur. .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing appointment orders for the post of Trained Graduate Teachers, AP Model Schools by raising objections which were not raised at the time of verification of certificates and which are against the Orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is illegal, arbitrary, and unjust, and consequently direct the respondents to issue the appointment orders to the petitioners as TGTs;

These petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petitions and the affidavits filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SMT.M.S.V.S.SUDHA RANI Advocate for the Petitioners in all the petitions and of learned Government Pleader for School Education (A.P.) for Respondents, in all the petitions, the Court made the following:

ORDER:

Post after two weeks in the adjourned Motion List. Any appointment made shall be subject to result of the Writ Petition. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, & Ex-Officio Project Director, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, Andhra Pradesh, 3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Zone- I, Kakinada Region.

4 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur (1 to 4 by RPAD) 5 One CC to SMT.M.S.V.S.SUDHA RANI, Advocate (OPUC) 6 Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (T.G.), HIGH COURT, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD (OUT) 7 One spare copy.

SRL HIGH COURT RKRJ DATED: 16.06.2015

NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS IN THE ADJOURNED MOTION LIST.

ORDER

W.P.Nos.16201, 11216, 10066 OF 2015 DIRECTION HIGH COURT Drafted by: SRL Date of Drafting : 18.06.2015 RKRJ DATED: 16.06.2015

NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS IN THE ADJOURNED MOTION LIST.

ORDER

W.P.Nos. 16201, 11216, 10066 OF 2015 DIRECTION