T. Abhinav Reddy v. The Andhra Psradesh State Electricity Board

t344s1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 214 OF 2OO4 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 21-07 -2OO3 made in O.S.No.207 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the ll Member tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings-Cum- Vll Additionat Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

1. T. Abhinav Reddy, S/o Sri Srinivasa Reddy, Occ: Student R/o. Sai Pragathi Apartments, Himayathnagar, Hderabad.

2. T. Rohini Reddy, Wo. Sri Srinivasa Reddy, R/o. Sai Pragathi Apartments Himayathnagar, Hderabad.

...Appellants AND 1 . The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, Secretary Vidyuth Soudha Somajiguda, Hyderabad

2. Ganga Raju, Occ: Builder, R/o 3-6-190/tu8-1 , Ragunama Apartments Hyderguda, Hyderabad.

Miss. Ragini, Occ: Employee in Andhra Bank, Sultan Bazar Branch Kothi Flderabad

4. The A.P. Transco, director Vrdyuth Soudha Khairatabad Hyderabad

5. The Telangana Transco, rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut, Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad

6. The Southe.n D stricbution Company, rep. by its Managing [)irc:ctor' Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

R-2 dismisr;ed br default vide court order dated 29'04-2011' Resoonderrt Nc,s. 5 & 6 are impleaded as per the Court Ord'er dt.o2-09-2015 irr CCAMP.No.35 of 2015.

.,Rt:SPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants :Sri P Pratap Reddy Counsel for the Fespcndent Nos.1,4 to 6 :Sri R Vinod Reddy (SC FOR TS TRANST:CI) Counsel for the F.espcndent Nos.2 & 3: --- The Court delivered tre following: Judgment

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA C.C.C.4.No.214 OF 2004 JUDGMENT ' (Per Hon'ble Sri lLtstice Abhinand Ktrmar Shavili) Despite the maner being listed today under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Fknce, this C-oun has no other option except to dismiss the Appeal for non- prosecution.

Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-Prosecution. No costs.

Mscellaneous petitions, if any, pend{ng sha[[ stand closed. Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The ll Member tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings-Cum- Vll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad

2. One CC to Sri P Pratap Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

3. O;. CC to Sri R Vinoi Reddv(SC for TSTRANSCo)' IOPUCI

4. Two CD CoPies W ADI(plp

HIGH COURT DATE D : 1 210212025 ,/ s s* s> ^.\f

JUDGMENT

I CCCA.No.214 o12004 :,-.

a) !L \ t, t., o"

l: l r-l j !

!

i I I I !

I l DISMISSING TI{E APPEAL FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSiTS t 1\ ;\ s .l _